was successfully added to your cart.

Listen


 

There would be a significant shift in the manner in which salaries are going to be structured henceforth, especially in cases where the Basic salary is expected to be lower than Rs. 15,000 a month, owing to one of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court.

Before we proceed to understand the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision, let us understand a few provisions of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952:

The term ‘Basic Wages’ has been defined under Section 2(b) of the Act

‘Basic wages means all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on duty or on leave or on holidays with wages in either case in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment and which are paid or payable in cash to him but does not include

(i) the cash value of any food concession;

(ii) any dearness allowance that is to say, all cash payments by whatever name called paid to an employee on account of a rise in the cost of living, house-rent allowance, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment;

(iii) any presents made by the employer; ‘

Further, by virtue of Section 6 of the Act (supra), the contribution towards the fund shall be made at a certain percentage of ‘the basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance, if any, for the time being, payable to each of the employees’

The question for consideration before the honourable Supreme Court was whether special allowances paid by an establishment to its employees would fall within the ambit of the term ‘Basic wages’ for the purpose of computation of deduction towards Provident Fund.

The essence of the judgement has been summarised in the following points:

  1. If the components of salary are such that they are paid to all employees across the Board regardless of their performance, then such components are considered to be a part of Basic wages.
  2. Those components which are included in the salaries of the employees owing to their performance, by way of attaining work-based targets, such as performance bonus, incentives, etc. should not be considered as a part of Basic wages.
  3. Components such as Overtime allowance, though in force in many concerns, would not be earned by all employees. Such components should not be considered as a part of Basic wages.

In view of the above, employers have to consciously re-evaluate their existing salary structures, especially in cases where the basic salaries are less than Rs. 15,000 per month, so as to ensure that the above aspects are taken care of.

In cases where the gross salaries of the employees are more than Rs. 15,000 per month, it would be ideal and conservative for the employer to fix the Basic salary at Rs. 15,000 and allocate the balance of salary (i.e. the difference between Gross monthly salary and Basic salary) among other components. In cases where the gross salaries are less than Rs. 15,000 per month, it would be ideal to have the entire salary considered as Basic wages, without making any allocations towards other components.

There have been instances in the past wherein the PF department has demanded contribution on ‘special allowance’ (in cases where the basic salary is less than Rs. 15,000 per month) on the ground that such components are incorporated in the salary structure with a view to mitigating contributions thereby increasing the employees’ take-home salaries.

Now that the department has the decision of the Supreme Court in its favour, employers can expect a lot of notices from the PF department shortly.


In case of any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us on pavan@bclindia.in or ankush@bclindia.in or write to us on bclindia.in/contact/. We would be glad to be of your assistance.

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of